tokala.net

GOD AND COUNTRY
America's One-World Primer


by
Many-Tears Leads-to-the-Yawning-Grave
[Who?]


in memory of
Elder John Kline
(1797-1864)
Linville Creek, Broadway, Virginia, USA
[Who?]


21 October 2021

INVOCATION

Atheism, feet firmly on solid ground, turns face to sky. "Tunkasila," she exclaims, hoisting reverently aloft smoke: "pilamaya, ye pilamaya, Wakan Tanka!" [1] Atheism calls that speaking in tongues; other traditions may vary. Peace be upon them and upon their progeny!

Peace be upon the progeny of all the Earth's peoples in their love of God.

Once addicted to harsh and juvenile mere rhetoric, Atheism aims now solely for ground truth; let us get to the Lotus of the Heart of the matter. She speaks with Scriptural authority, now, too: not from the Scriptures of one culture only, but from all the planet's. Let Earth's peoples rejoice!


THE BEGINNING OF WISDOM

"Fear of the Lord[,]" as multiple Tanakh (Old Testament) sources attest, "is the beginning of wisdom."[2] Obviously, knowing the Commandments - and keeping them - satisfies the Almighty and...

"What in God's Name are you mewling about?!" Atheism explodes. "Is that the extent of your mortal trembling before God? A tip of the hat and nervous, sideways glance as you whistle your way down the path, hoping not to be especially noticed? Doesn't representing God's Truth before crowds fill you with sick dread, lest you misspeak or be ill-informed? Aren't you terrified to (even unknowingly) spread lies about God? The Most High deserves more respect, than mere wriggling after some Get-Out-of-Hell card!

"Are your hearts so cold, that even Bahá'u'lláh and the Báb failed to convince you all Scripture from everywhere is Sacred and edifying? Accept this one simple proposition, and even interminably protracted sectarian hatred and bloodshed must eventually wither to nothingness all over the world. None will be vanquished; no one tradition will lord it over any others; no man or woman anywhere already standing in the light of God will be cast into shadows. Only conviction to share the Earth with all comers and respect all faiths that love God and humanity: to miss such an opportunity could lead to unimaginable calamity; for your great-great-great-great-grandchildren will inhabit this planet, eventually - God willing."

Atheism offers a silent prayer that God be willing and patient yet with unruly Creation; let mature Atheism midwive mature faiths. Give her the strength and vision to be a gentle, loving, and sororal companion to all. For the love of God.

For fear of the Lord is indeed the beginning of wisdom - but only the beginning.


ADAM'S RIB

Feverishly heaping indictments against the Almighty from Scripture after Scripture, Atheism stumbles onto Divine Parascenium backstage where only cosmic radiation, hissing endlessly into fathomless void, awaits. Luckily, the Buddha, wielding Vedantic cosmology as a powerful torch, already long ago discovered that path to its destination; so Atheism does stand firmly on solid ground. "God or no God," she proclaims, "we should act as though there were One."

Atheism always thought merely striking the blinders of ignorance and delusion from people's eyes would suffice. She little understood, at first, how all the world's faiths already struggle to do this; how the Dharmic traditions, in particular, make taming the ego's delusions their whole raison d'ętre: with infinite patience, compassion and subtlety of thought. See the world with fresh eyes and be not deceived!

Mainstream Christians already know this inevitable refuge; no responsible, eminent Christian today actually believes the Earth cobbled together in some breakneck six-day (or even 6000-year) process by indifferent Celestial workmanship - not even bothering to put lights up in the workshop until the project's third day. The real God, the God of Reality, focused truly unimaginably vast reserves of pure energy on a single point in a void, about 14 billion years ago - and let it go.

For hundreds of thousands of years, this plasmic energy field was so hot and dense, not even a photon of light could escape to illuminate chaos. Now, in ten or a hundred thousand years or sooner, this Creation story as well may be relegated to the status of mere mythos in light of new knowledge; but in the meantime, it serves to shine at least a feeble beam into the past and possible future of a God truly effectively Immortal and Powerful beyond all understanding: a God who thinks nothing of planting a seed and waiting tens of billions of years for it to bear fruit.

What are we then, really? In the first place, we are descendants of a single-celled bacteria. Retch - or titter nervously - it is true; seen from space, life on Earth might resemble more than anything else a massive colony of simple cells still. Bacteria and humanity contrasted ought inspire even greater wonder and awe, than any breath of life puffing into Divinity's Personally-Fashioned clay golems. Thank Science for helping us understand exactly what we really worship God for, that we needn't rely solely on late-Bronze or early-Iron Age dreams, hallucinations, allegories, prejudices and myths to inform us.

The original bacteria bobbed happily and reproduced themselves in the oceans for 2 billion years, before finally one cell enveloped another, thus acquiring a nucleus. After another billion-plus years, the superior fitness of nucleated cells won out and ever increasingly complex life forms developed – until 900 million years later, the genus Homo emerged. These descended-of-germ-cells apes, soon to lose most of their hair, clung desperately to an insanely whirling, revolving, rocketing dust mote traversing hundreds of miles per second in multiple directions simultaneously: these affecting little apes seem also the first of their kind with wit to inquire after the Causes of things - as the galaxy they inhabit screams along at 4/3 million miles per hour relative to its neighbor galaxies.

For those who quibble about evolution and whence came life out of dead matter, Atheism declares all Creation evolved - and is evolving yet. Every new generation of stars begins with ever-greater densities of heavy metals forged in the violent death throes of older, more massive stars: giving successive planetary systems richer and richer palettes of complex materials to combine and recombine. Life may very well be but an inevitable outcome of material evolution condensing complexity out of energy across billions of years. And if any would call this shortchanging God's glory, Atheism rejoins that God's glory can only finally, really shine forth to full effect when clothed in absolute Truth and Candor.

Atheism descends to a stage whisper: "Lo, I will show you an inner secret of what you really, really are, then. The first particles that condensed out of that original super-hot plasma - little more than perturbations on an electro-magnetic field - eventually found one another and bonded into slightly more complex particles that continued bonding, until stable atoms began forming. These infinitesimally tiny atoms, with their electron shells concealing even many-orders-of-magnitude-smaller nuclei, are the basic building blocks of all matter.

"Each of these atoms comprises a billionth of 1% bound energy and 99.999999999% empty space; this is the Vacancy your non-Abrahamic Asian forebears promised you: you are borrowed energy dancing on a Void.

"And for anyone who thinks God has not given gifts richly, consider that you contain millions of dollars worth of electrical potential in the octillions of atoms in your bodies. Every single one of you. The Earth itself is a vast sink of incalculably valuable potential energy. And that's just one planet in an observable universe boasting over a trillion galaxies, each containing hundreds of billions of stars capable of inspiring planets - hundreds of billions times a trillion stars under God's jurisdiction."

Now we're just barely clearing our throats to start really talking about the Glory of God.

Even an elementary school child at a Bible study in a musty, neglected classroom in the basement of a magnificent old stone church, after hearing the Tower of Babel story for the very first time, might wander through dark stone-lined passages afterward and suddenly emerge into the resplendant grandeur of a perfect spring day (ancient tree auras reaching everywhere into light) to conclude that the Tower of Babel story's a load of loose and aggressively noxious bullshit: false on its very face and profoundly insulting to Divine Reputation. Not just that some dusty proto-architects piling up clay bricks might have given Omnipotent Omniscience "cause for concern" about the future somehow, but that God is depicted as having come down because of it and confused all the languages of the Earth: making things vexingly more difficult and dangerous for everyone, down to this very day.

It's a just-so story that is just not so; and neither just to the Wisdom - nor the Love - of God. Would the God of hundreds of billions times a trillion stars really come barging into some little planet somewhere like a mean-drunk father: aching to knock over a child's carefully-arranged blocks and accuse him of some obscure Celestial building code violation, punishing by forbidding him to ever again speak with any of his brothers or sisters? "Who, then, doth more wrong than one who utters a lie concerning God, and rejects the Truth when it comes to him?" the Holy Ku'ran enquires.[3]

Atheism is not a religion; though it is a faith; Science circumscribes just the same secular society modern polities already understand and function within. Atheism needs no dogmas, no rituals, no priests. Every soul's business with God is its own, after all; Jesus told us to pray in our closets, and Atheism has heard Him. "Whether the dogma obtain, Malunkyaputta, that the world is eternal, or that the world is not eternal, there still remain birth, old age, death, sorrow, lamentation, misery, grief, and despair, for the extinction of which in the present life I am prescribing," the Buddha declared.[4]

Atheism's heart aches with the burdens of innumerable little godlets delighting in blood sacrifice, egging credulous nations on to foul genocide, high-fiving those openly gloating about lounging in houses they hadn't built and drinking from wells they hadn't dug. Who justifies these barbarisms, now? Faith traditions evolve and develop as the faithful gain new understandings of Scripture and God. Else whence came itself Christianity?


CHILDREN OF ABRAHAM

Christianity, Atheism has not come to spite you or insult your ear with interminable Scriptural carping and pilpul. Atheism only quotes the Book from time to time because she frankly loves it with searing passion and thinks every literate person on Earth should read it cover-to-cover multiple times. Atheism, for the life of her, cannot understand why more people don't regularly quote passages from the Sermons Jesus delivered.

You are nearly a third of the world's faithful; together with your elder brother, Judaism, and your stricter, more-to-the-point, younger brother, Islam, the Children of Abraham all told comprise over 55% of the Earth's peoples. Even just a united front of Abrahamic traditions would represent a powerful global political force in any international democratic process. Such a weighty responsibility ought not be dismissed lightly.

You are repositors of unique traditions: even with doubtful early legends and cruelties, the rich legacy of Judaism remains pertinent to the human condition always; the Prophets of Israel in the ears of kings ought to the end of time grace the consciences of public servants everywhere. And Islam - that shining, well-forged sabre cleaving every Gordian Knot of dogma with submission - forbids "sins and trespasses against truth or reason ... and saying things about God of which ye have no knowledge."[5] Atheism stands and applauds those conditions; she intends to see them become universal.

If Christendom stamps its foot and demands Jesus be acknowledged King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Atheism will rush to second the motion; but His natural Prime Minister must be Muhammad ibn 'Abd Allah. Judaism - arguably synonymous with the Law - can populate a judiciary; Gautama Buddha radiates perfect spiritual advice unstintingly to all; while Sri Krsna provides Celestial Security and incisive psychological training everywhere. Even Old Man Coyote may find some useful niche to occupy in this imaginary Divine Government.

But the actual government of the world has been left to the children of men and women everywhere.

More than anything, Atheism wishes people would just stop arguing about what God reportedly said thousands of years ago, compose themselves, and start listening to what God is saying right now: right this instant. Even a still, small voice may also speak firmly and clearly.

Open your hearts to the Love of God, Children of Abraham! There is Wisdom On High for you.


GOD

What, then, is this God of Whom you speak, gentle Atheism? Is It a real thing - or mere figment of unbridled fancy? Setting aside that God is primarily at all times simply the Great Mystery: i.e., everything in the Universe we have no first clue about, God is at the very least a sort of inverse Platonic Form. Plato believed his imaginary Forms were perfect and eternal, while material reality modeled on them was always imperfect and transitory. Thoughts and ideas apparently only arise in certain kinds of highly organized living matter, though - so a Platonic Form can only be a smoothed approximation and average of countless observations about the real material world in a sentient brain.

Even if this is all God is - an industriously polished, evolving, multi-millennial sketch portrait of what people think God must be like - it remains of immense value to humanity. The God of all the Scriptures is the world's repository of every good intention, every merciful impulse, every determined and well-thought-out action - once you shake out the chaff from older, less well-informed understandings of former times. Humanity still needs some continuing pure Sacred standard to aspire toward; a severely tested and re-tested Platonic Form as an ongoing role model is not a bad thing to reach for.

God is so much more than that, though, as every believing soul knows instinctively. God is in the ensemble of brain waves by billions penetrating heaven and Earth in their search for an Answer; God is in the harmonizing interaction of conscious minds with their own sub- and pre-conscious counterparts - in meditation and prayer. As Friedrich Engels wrote to J. Bloch in 1890: "...even the reflexes of all these actual struggles in the brains of the participants, political, juristic, philosophical theories, religious views and their further development into systems of dogmas - also exercize their influence upon the course of the historical struggles and in many cases preponderate in determining their form."[6] As Marx himself had it: "...theory itself becomes a material force when it has seized the masses."[7]

Atheism does believe in God; Atheism knows God is real - even if only as the Body of Christ and the earnest prayerful impulses of everyone on Earth turning spirit toward sky. The rest is all speculation and idle chatter.

But our children - and our children's children's children - are a Sacred trust for all time.


REVELATION

Atheism purses her lips, looking around appraisingly. "I think our patient American friends have waited long enough for some sign this is, indeed, their primer: directed to them, while the whole world watches. Thomas Paine - author of the pro-independence pamphlet Common Sense, that swept like wildfire through the Colonies at the start of the American Revolution - was eventually elected a Deputy to the National Convention of France, after publishing what to this day remains the most cogent, effective and cunning refutation of Edmund Burke's The Revolution in France ever penned: The Rights of Man.

"At a moment of dire peril and danger in the already oft-emperiled, 3-year-old French Revolution, September 1792: a powerful coalition of royal foreign armies had invaded and were threatening Paris. Frightened Parisians fell upon captured French Royalists already in prison and murdered them in cold blood, lest they be freed to join the battle to extinguish the Revolution. This was the first crack in the branch of civil order in France; after January, when the Convention tried and beheaded the King, the whole branch came crashing down.

"Thomas Paine, by the way - with too few other deputies supporting him - pled for the King's life repeatedly before the Convention, even offering to have His Majesty exiled deep into the American wilderness west. But, of course, realpolitik demands kings who lose their crowns must also lose their lives, lest they become rally points for fresh tumult. In this case, the regicides unwittingly cooked a whole Pandora's Kettle full of tumult: counter-revolution, rebellion, civil war, guerilla war, foreign invasion - with guillotine and summary execution for many."

Students of Marx, Engels, and Lenin may profitably remark here that people who make Comrade Stalin's psychopathic brutality an excuse to extinguish any breath of socialism or communism in polite society should remember the Terror in France came through bourgeois leadership: any hint of socialism in 1793 was inchoate. The violence always stems from the civil war; and civil wars are always launched by reactionaries. It is an iron law of history. The people only want peace and justice.

Predictably, the regicides in the Convention immediately turned on each other after the King's demise. The very people who'd been friends of Jefferson, when he'd recently been the American ambassador, were now inexplicably painted as the principal domestic enemies of the state. They were even called Federalists, after the then-nascent new system in the United States.

The Convention's Federalists were hunted to death or exile and their hapless political ally, Thomas Paine, imprisoned and seemingly destined for the guillotine. While in prison, he wrote a magnificent Deist declaration of faith: The Age of Reason. "THE WORD OF GOD IS THE CREATION WE BEHOLD[,]' it declares, "and it is in this word, which no human invention can counterfeit or alter, that God speaketh universally to man."[8]

Revelation, he maintained, "is revelation to the first person only, and hearsay to every other, and consequently they are not obliged to believe it."[9] Atheism nodded vigorously and hugged herself with delight: "Omnipotent Omnipresence can speak to anyone, at any time, for any purpose," she affirmed. "God can speak to the entire human species ensemble, with every person hearing the Words simultaneously in their own native tongue - then turning to their neighbor to verify: 'Did you hear that?'"

Atheism's only true Revelation would be exactly that, because surely Omnipresent Omniscience above all knows just informing one particular person to transmit a message intact to the whole of humanity is a frustratingly slow - and even dangerous - gambit. God has left us free to figure things out the best we can.


FEDERALISM AND THE PLURAL EXECUTIVE

The doomed French Federalists agreed the new French Republic should at least resemble the United States by having independently governed provinces, like our states, united at the center only insofar as general, national issues needed resolving. In the France of 1793, this was not an unreasonable idea: even the French language was not spoken in most provincial areas at the time. The radical Jacobins and Cordeliers, however, used the very same language question as potent evidence unitary executive powers just seized from the Crown were absolutely necessary to the very survival of France as a nation; and that the horrors of civil war and foreign invasion could only be defeated by strict and severe central control from the capital.

The delicate niceties of political theory from an armchair no longer apply in times of harrowing crises and war.

Even so, armchair theorists of goodwill - given the luxury of peace and time to research their riddles - can observe in recent world history a vast divide: between those who think a simple, unicameral legislature with expansive centralized powers, like the France of 1793, is precisely the right answer to every question and those who follow the Anglo-American example, with its insistence powers be distributed widely and independently and popular legislatures yoked with upper houses, whose members represent wider constituencies and stand for election less frequently. Outside the sphere of British-spawned political practice, the Republic of Venice was renowned for the intricacy and balance of its governmental institutions - mainly because great pains were taken to include every possible major interest group as stakeholders in the enterprise - and the Republic of Venice stood for a thousand years.

The burden of American Communism is the burden of the world.

American Communists may espouse, defend and develop every good thing in the American experience and represent it honestly before the world. While American Communists understand as well as anyone the various advantages and powers of democratic centralism, they can also recognize the left-right, conservative-liberal/progressive, urban-rural dichotomy has been an enduring - probably necessary - political feature of every human society since the first cities arose. Conservative counsels to caution, fiscal responsibility, limited and strictly defined government powers at all levels, frequent and openly contested change of persons in government offices, and a decent respect for wisdom in accumulated historical experience are guideposts for any upright public servant anywhere.

Even for revolutionaries - perhaps especially for revolutionaries, pace Pol Pot.

The revolutionary National Convention of France was in a world-historic struggle for the survival and advance of democratic principles in France, Europe, and the world. Soured on Executive power by centuries of smug and inbred royal excesses, they resolved to abolish the Executive branch of French government entirely, establishing instead a system of Legislative committees exercizing absolute authority over the nation's future. Not one committee only, but two separate and completely independent 12-man boards - the Committee of Public Safety and the Committee of General Security - were created in the heat of internecine warfare and each and every one of the 24 men appointed to these committees embodied expansive and effectively unchecked powers nationwide.

This is the agile and focused system that saved the very life of the juvenile First French Republic and made democratic centralism an enduring feature of revolutionary governments everywhere, going forward. It also produced the Terror that threatened to murder even a great and gentle soul like Thomas Paine. Power is a two-edged sword; it ought be wielded in the fear of God.

Yes, the Federalist Papers - themselves only four or five years old at the time - had been translated into French and published already; but who has the leisure to examine complex new ideas in the maelstroms of revolution and war? Anyone who did read them might have been forewarned about the dangers of - and potential remedies against - unchecked arbitrary powers. "[A]ll observations founded upon the danger of usurpation," Alexander Hamilton declared in the Federalist #31, "ought to be referred to the composition and structure of the government, not to the nature or extent of its powers."[10]

Go back and read that sentence again. It is the single most compact and weighty observation in the entire canon of classical political science. It is the perfect retort for every conceivable objection to "dictatorial" socialist and communist governments anywhere - assuming socialists and communists take it to heart and embody its wisdom in their actions.

After witnessing from afar the eventual collapse of the First French Republic and the painfully unsettling career of Napoleon Bonaparte, Thomas Jefferson wrote to Antoine L. C. Destutt de Tracey in 1811: "The experiment in France failed after a short course, and not from any circumstances peculiar to the times or nation but from those internal jealousies and dissensions in the Directory which will ever arise among men equal in power without a principle to decide and control their differences."[11] Twelve years later, just before he died, he assured Adamantios Coray "a plurality in the supreme executive will forever split into discordant factions, distract the nation, annihilate its energies, and force the nation to rally under a single head, generally a usurper."[12]


THE DUTY OF MAN

"The righteous," as the Proverbist has it, "considereth the cause of the poor: but the wicked regardeth not to know it."[13] So, also, Confucius' "[t]he superior man helps those whose need is urgent, and not the rich to be richer."[14] The Ku'ran concludes: "By no means shall ye attain righteousness unless ye give (freely) of that which ye love; and whatever ye give, of a truth God knoweth it all."[15]

"Make your acts your piety," Sri Krsna blurted.[16] The Buddha continued: "Let a man overcome anger by love, let him overcome evil by good, let him overcome greed with liberality and lies with truth."[17] Leviticus brings home the point: "And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee; then thou shalt relieve him: yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with thee."[18]

"The duty of man," Paine wrote, "is not a wilderness of turnpike gates, through which he is to pass by tickets from one to the other. It is plain and simple, and consists but of two points. His duty to God, which every man must feel; and with respect to his neighbor, to do as he would be done by."[19]

"Blessed is he that considereth the poor:" the Psalmist assures us, "the LORD will deliver him in time of trouble. The LORD will preserve him, and keep him alive; and he shall be blessed upon the earth: and thou wilt not deliver him unto the will of his enemies."[20] Thomas Paine evaded the guillotine thanks to fresh upheaval in the Revolutionary government and survived all-told 72 years. "For the needy shall not alway be forgotten: the expectation of the poor shall not perish for ever."[21]

"One extreme produces the other;" Paine declared: "to make one rich many must be made poor; neither can the system be supported by other means."[22] Admirable conviction aside, the extreme simplicity of the statement makes it slippery to fact-check in the real world. We can, however, remember the patron saint of Capitalism, Adam Smith, took pains to warn us his magnificent Invisible Hand - if left completely unregulated and ungoverned - would inevitably end in unsupportable concentrations of wealth leading to general economic collapse.

Serious devotees of Mr. Smith, therefore, will readily agree governments have legitimate interest in regulating economic activity in their jurisdictions: it's not just Marx and Lenin, then. Only the exact details need to be worked out and administered in the real world, superintended by an alert, educated and interested public. The public business has never been without vexation and effort anywhere.

Atheism was tapping her foot softly, but eventually lost patience (as she usually does whenever people start talking about Adam Smith). "Here, give me that; I'll clear this all up pronto. Hey, all you children of God out there! Borrowed energy bags dancing! Listen up!

"Nobody's talking about taking away your precious market economy. All they're saying is there's got to be a basic floor under the dignity of every person on Earth: that they not go hungry, or sleep rough unwillingly, or suffer and die for want of a doctor. Government can arrange those accomodations according to whatever laws the legislatures establish. It's business as usual.

"So the next time somebody tries to impress you with the 'evils' of socialism, at least tell them honestly you probably aren't very well-informed on the subject (nobody is). Come back with three truckloads of documents from Scandinavia to illustrate your point. 'But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.'"[24]

As Madison observed: "the public good, the real welfare of the great body of the people, is the supreme object to be pursued; and ... no form of government whatever has any other value than as it may be fitted for the attainment of this object."[23]


A UNITED STATES OF THE WORLD

Over a century of puerile lies about socialism and communism in the mouths of frightened and deluded hominids: why? "And all that believed were together, and had all things common; and sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need."[25] Explain again how Apostolic communism is irrelevent to "the modern world" and how the stench of socialism anywhere disgusts God's nostrils.

No less an authority, than Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, in 1915, explicitly declared the immediate goal of international socialism: "A United States of the World."[26]

Oh, beloved country! you have stopped your ears for a hundred years and more to this direct and irresistible challenge. You have spent twenty-thousand million kings' ransoms arming yourselves against the imagined danger In your own name, pouring out tanker trucks of lifeblood in Vietnam and Korea to prevent others embracing it. The very Second World War would have been impossible, had you immediately and prudently addressed this question a hundred years ago, when Lenin was still alive.

Socialism and Communism are not your enemies, America. They're an inevitable consequence of the impulse begun in your own Revolution, tramped 'round the world o'er centuries and come back to embrace you warmly. Waiting for you to take the lead again and show the world how it's done.

Waiting for you to act on the Scriptures, rather than just parrot them, century after century. "And they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more."[27] Are you too shy to stand in a generation striving to realize Isaiah's prophecy? Who did you think was supposed to do it? No Legions of Angels will support an army unwilling to commit itself.

What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?[28] But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him? My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.[29]

Even Atheism is urging you on to God's work, now, beloved. The hour is near. Pick a side: God or Ego, Love or Ignorance, Life or Universal Extinction.


THE FOUNDERS

But the Founding Fathers! the Founders! they'll never go along with this crack-brained idea!

Consider Madison:

In cases where it might be doubtful on which side justice lies, what better umpires could be desired by two violent factions, flying to arms and tearing a State to pieces, than the representatives of a confederate State, not heated by the local flame? To the impartiality of judges, they would unite the affection of friends. Happy would it be if such a remedy for its infirmities could be enjoyed by all free governments; if a project equally effectual could be established for the universal peace of mankind![30]

The principal objection to this wholesome sentiment was, of course, primitive transportation systems making global travel at the time prohibitively slow and dangerous. But "the natural limit of a republic," Madison reasoned, "is that distance from the centre which will barely allow the representatives to meet as often as may be necessary for the administration of public affairs."[31] We can fly commercial non-stop from Tahiti to Paris, now, so planet Earth is definitely grown-up enough to merit its very own first comprehensive representative government.

But the factions! a world government would be overwhelmed by factional infighting!

Wrong: "...a well constructed Union," yet again Madison remarked, has a "tendency to break and control the violence of faction."[32] "[T]he same advantage which a republic has over a democracy, in controlling the effects of faction, is enjoyed by a large over a small republic[.]"[33] "[A] government by representation," as Jefferson wrote to Pierre Samuel Dupont de Nemours in 1816, "is capable of extension over a greater surface of country than any other form."[34] "[T]he larger the society," Madison confidently explained, "provided it lie within a practicable sphere, the more duly capable it will be of self-government."[35]

But it will inevitably turn into a dictatorship!

"[F]ederal bodies (tend) rather to anarchy among the members, than to tyranny in the head."[36] That's the Father of the Constitution telling you that; stop and take a breath! you're all worked up over a monster under the bed.

In a free government the security for civil rights must be the same as that for religious rights. It consists in the one case in the multiplicity of interests, and in the other in the multiplicity of sects. The degree of security in both cases will depend upon the number of interests and sects; and this may be presumed to depend upon the extent of country and number of people comprehended under the same government.[37]

The world entire can provide the greatest possible number of competing interests and sects in this solar system currently; and is therefore the safest possible repository for republican, democratic, and religious rights in theory now.

Oh, but the American people are an unruly lot: fiercely independent and impatient of government. And good for them! everyone on Earth can be that way, if they carve enough freedom out of the granite and marble of received political opinions to institute it. Governments can be structured to maximize individual liberty and minimize government intrusion; the Federalist Papers are a blueprint for just such an enterprise.

But the people must participate in the process, on at least some level. As Jefferson rhapsodized:

...the way to have good and safe government, is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the function he is competent to do. Let the national government be entrusted with the defense of the nation, and its foreign and federal relations; the State governments with the civil rights, laws, police, and administration of the States generally; the counties with the local concerns of the counties, and each ward directs the interests within itself.... What has destroyed liberty and the rights of man in every government which has ever existed under the sun? The generalizing and concentrating all cares and powers into one body.... Where every man is a sharer in the direction of his ward republic, or of some of the higher ones, and feels that he is a participator in the government of affairs, not merely at an election one day in the year, but every day; when there shall not be a man in the State who will not be a member of some one of its councils, great or small, he will let the heart be torn out of his body sooner than his power be wrested from him by a Caesar or a Bonaparte.[38]

Stop thinking of a world government as some all-consuming behemoth that will suck the life out of nations; start thinking of it as a new and even stronger link in the chain of federalist power distributions that can make the peoples' liberties even more secure for centuries to come: the whole world's liberties.

Those are sentiments as though predesigned to steel the convictions of any Leninist: "it is precisely complete liberty that the proletariat, as the foremost champion of democracy, is striving to attain."[39] He is no Social-Democrat who forgets in practice his obligation to be ahead of all in raising, accentuating, and solving every general democratic question."[40]

Under socialism much of 'primitive' democracy will inevitably be revived, since, for the first time in the history of civilized society, the mass of the population will rise to taking an independent part, not only in voting and elections, but also in the everyday administration of the state. Under socialism all will govern in turn and will soon become accustomed to no one governing.[41]

But "[i]n order to succeed," Lenin warns us, "we must understand the history of the old bourgeois world in all its profundity."[42] "They picture socialism as some remote, unknown and dim future. But socialism is now gazing at us from all the windows of modern capitalism; socialism is outlined directly, practically, by every important measure that constitutes a forward step on the basis of this modern capitalism."[43]

As Engels frankly admitted: "complete self-government on the American model ... is what we too must have."[44] The United States, he wrote to Hermann Schlüter in 1892, "will one day bring about a change that will astound the world. Once the Americans get started it will be with an energy and vehemence compared with which we in Europe shall be mere children."[45]

If only this humble and abbreviated primer could loosen the well-springs of American political genius again, the world would shout.


THE MORAL CONDITION OF GOVERNMENTS

Hundreds of billions times a trillion objections will be raised; and each will be answered in turn. As the Divine Sri Krsna reminds us: "all undertakings are clouded with faults as fire by smoke."[46] "Revolutions, then," Thomas Paine wrote, "have for their object a change in the moral condition of governments...."[47]

In contemplating revolutions, it is easy to perceive that they may arise from two distinct causes; the one, to avoid or get rid of some calamity, the other, to obtain some great and positive good; and the two may be distinguished by the names of active and passive revolutions. In those which proceed from the former cause, the temper becomes incensed and soured; and the redress, obtained by danger, is too often sullied by revenge.

But in those which proceed from the latter, the heart, rather animated than agitated, enters severely upon the subject. Reason and discussion, persuasion and conviction, become the weapons in the contest, and it is only when those are attempted to be suppressed that recourse is had to violence.

....If, therefore, the good to be obtained be worthy of a passive, rational and costless revolution, it would be bad policy to prefer waiting for a calamity that should force a violent one.... It may be considered as an honor to the animal faculties of man to obtain redress by courage and danger, but it is far greater honor to the rational faculties to accomplish the same object by reason, accomodation, and general consent.[48]

The American Revolution - unlike the French, Russian, and Chinese, whose first order of business was teaching vast, impoverished peasant masses how to read and write in the smoking ruins of disastrous civil wars - had as its first order of business sending fresh armies into the Ohio Valley to chase out the Native inhabitants there. The American Revolution was not about class conflict or any other weighty theoretical question; it was simply a matter of an already extant Colonial elite thumbing its nose at the King and Parliament in London and telling them to mind their own business going forward. The colonial legislatures weren't overthrown - they were transformed; the English common law wasn't abandoned; it governs us still.

As revolutions go, we Americans had an easy one - relatively bloodless and cordial. That should inform our confidence that it can be done so. Socialists and Communists can frankly admit the myriad economic questions will be best answered by general debate and consent over the course of decades - or perhaps centuries, if need be. So long as the material, political, and spiritual dignity of every child of God on Earth is guaranteed by the new World Constitution, subtler and thornier economic conundrums can be settled by trial and error separately in different countries, and appreciated in the global center.

The yawning and urgent task at the moment is establishment of the world republic: the United States of the World, the one coherent and feasible projected platform where the screaming existential crises of climate change and nuclear proliferation can be broken - the one immediately, and the other over time with sacrifice and resolve, under Science. The United States of the World will not surrender any rights currently enjoyed by American citizens - but will expand the civil rights of every individual on Earth, including Americans. The United States of the World will end for all time the putrid and unbelievable scandal that children still starve to death on Earth, notwithstanding thousands of years of upright and fervent prayer.

Why may we not suppose [Paine asked] that the great father of all is pleased with variety of devotion; and that the greatest offense we can act is that by which we seek to torment and render each other miserable? For my own part I am fully satisfied that what I am now doing, with an endeavor to conciliate mankind, to render their condition happy, to unite nations that have hitherto been enemies, and to extirpate the horrid practice of war and break the chains of slavery and oppression, is acceptable in His sight, and being the best service I can perform I act it cheerfully.[49]

God said it's our job to dress and keep this planet: our precious Grandmother, Unci; it can't be accomplished by tearing one another's children to bloody shreds over vanities and greed. We must humble our Egos before God and admit we on Earth are but all one people - not later, not someday: now, everywhere. It's really just that simple.

Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.[50]


ATHEISM'S CONCLUSION

Rinpoches and Lamas, Bhikkhus and Bhikkhunis; Rabbis; Imams, Hadrats, Hajjiis, Marabouts, Mullahs and Mujaddids; Acharyas, Sadhus and Gurus, Yogis; Patriarchs, Popes, Cardinals, Apostles, Primates, Vicars, Priors, Bishops and Archbishops, Abbots and Abbesses, Priests and High Priests, Monks, Nuns, Elders, Deacons, Preachers, Pastors, Reverends, Ministers, Missionaries, Doctors, Chaplains; Priestesses and High Priestesses, Bards, Archdruids, Witches, Solitary Practitioners; Shamans; all Wakan and all Children of God: draw nigh and hear the conclusion of Atheism's prayer.

And make not God's name an excuse in your oaths against doing good, or acting rightly, or making peace between persons; For God is one who heareth and knoweth all things. [Holy Ku'ran, Sura ii.224]

The Angel of Atheism is not your enemy; she is your clear-eyed sister, whose love for each of you is universal. She lives by Science; and by the Sacred Light glowing in the Lotus of her heart. She walks with Isaiah, with Jesus of Nazareth; she hears the voice of Krsna, as though it were yesterday - or tomorrow; she will follow the Buddha into any Void, singing: la ilaha illa'llah.

Atheism has fasted herself to lean intent, face bathed in tears of engaged love known only to God.

Hear her prayer!

"Know that you are all correct - and all wanting, in some respect. The greatest want among you is each other! Come together and together help guide the Earth's peoples into peace and freedom under God.

"Open the gates to the kingdom of heaven!

"Let the peoples in."

Amen.


NOTES

About thirty years ago, a shadow spirit in a dream rather soberly bestowed the name Many-Tears Leads-to-the-Yawning-Grave on one Marshall Munger Kerr - a person otherwise of no particular note or merit. As he had by then already long and regularly offered grateful smoke to the Four Directions, Hanwi, Unci, and Wakan Tanka with self-composed Lakota prayer, he felt confident whence that spirit arose. No actual Sioux wicasa wakan ever vetted this experience, however, so he makes no extraordinary claims about the name; Marshall is just a dreamer - and Many-Tears is his spirit name. [Back to Text]

The essay's dedicatee, Church of the Brethren's Elder John Kline, was a lifelong, incredibly effective pacifist abolitionist church organizer across the whole of the mountain west of Virginia, murdered by Confederate irregulars in 1864. [Back to Text]

[1] "Grandfather Spirit, thank you, indeed thank you, Great Mystery!" (Lakota) [Back to Text]

[2] Proverbs 1:7 [Back to Text]

[3] Holy Ku'ran, Sura xxxix:32 [Back to Text]

[4] The Majjhima-Nikaya Sutta, The Bible of the World. Robert O. Ballou, ed. New York, Viking Press, 1959, pp.258-59 [Back to Text]

[5] Holy Ku'ran, Sura vii:33 [Back to Text]

[6] Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Selected Works. Moscow, Progress Publishers, 1973., Vol. III, p.487 [Back to Text]

[7] Karl Marx. "Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right." Introduction. Karl Marx: Early Writings. T.B. Bottomore, ed. & tr. New York, McGraw Hill, 1964, p.52 [Back to Text]

[8] Thomas Paine. The Age of Reason. (1795) Baltimore, Ottenheimer Pub., n.d., p.29 [Back to Text]

[9] ibid., p.8 [Back to Text]

[10] Alexander Hamilton, Federalist #31. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. The Federalist. (1787-89) New York, Random House, n.d., p.192 [Back to Text]

[11] Thomas Jefferson to Antoine L. C. Destutt de Tracey, 26 Jan 11, The Political Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Edward Dumbauld, ed. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc., 1955, p.177 [Back to Text]

[12] Thomas Jefferson to Adamantios Coray, 31 Oct 23, ibid., p.179 [Back to Text]

[13] Proverbs 29:7 [Back to Text]

[14] The Analects of Confucious, The Wisdom of the Living Religions, Joseph Gaer, ed. New York, Dodd, Mead & Co., 1956, pp.101-2 [Back to Text]

[15] Holy Ku'ran, Sura iii:92 [Back to Text]

[16] The Bhagavad-Gita, Wisdom, op.cit., p.130 [Back to Text]

[17] The Dhammapada, Bible of the World, op.cit., p.24 [Back to Text]

[18] Leviticus 25:35 [Back to Text]

[19] Thomas Paine. The Rights of Man. Garden City, NY, Dolphin Books, 1961., p.305 [Back to Text]

[20] Psalms 41:2 [Back to Text]

[21] Psalms 9:18 [Back to Text]

[22] Paine, Rights, op.cit., p.493 [Back to Text]

[23] Madison, Federalist #45, p.299 [Back to Text]

[24] Matthew 23:13 [Back to Text]

[25] Acts 2:45 [Back to Text]

[26] V.I. Lenin. "On the Slogan for a United States of Europe." (1915), Selected Works. Moscow, Progress Publishers, 1975, vol. I, p.664 [Back to Text]

[27] Isaiah 2:4 [Back to Text]

[28] James 2:14-16 [Back to Text]

[29] 1 John 3:17-18 [Back to Text]

[30] Madison, Federalist #43, op.cit., p.285 [Back to Text]

[31] Madison, Federalist #14, op.cit., p.81 [Back to Text]

[32] Madison, Federalist #10, op.cit., pp.53-4 [Back to Text]

[33] ibid., p.61 [Back to Text]

[34] Thomas Jefferson to Pierre Samuel Dupont de Nemours, 24 Apr 16, Political, op.cit., pp.49-50 [Back to Text]

[35] Madison, Federalist #51, op.cit., p.341 [Back to Text]

[36] Madison, Federalist #18, op.cit., p.112 [Back to Text]

[37] Madison, Federalist #51, op.cit., pp.339-40 [Back to Text]

[38] Thomas Jefferson to Jos C Cabell, 2 Feb 16, The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Adrienne Koch and William Peden, ed. New York, Modern Library, 1944, pp.660-61 [Back to Text]

[39] V.I. Lenin. "Two Tasks of Social-Democracy in the Democratic Revolution." (1905), op.cit., vol. I, p.468 [Back to Text]

[40] V.I. Lenin. "What Is To Be Done?" (1905), op.cit., vol. I, p.185 [Back to Text]

[41] V.I. Lenin. "The State and Revolution." (1917), op.cit., vol. II, pp.323-24, 294-5 [Back to Text]

[42] V.I. Lenin. "Ninth Congress of the RCP(B). Report of the CC." (1920), op.cit., vol. III, pp.284-85 [Back to Text]

[43] V.I. Lenin. "The Impending Catastrophe and How to Combat It." (1917), op.cit., vol. II, pp.212-13 [Back to Text]

[44] Friederich Engels. "A Critique of the Draft Social-Democratic Programme of 1891", Marx and Engels, op.cit., Vol. III, p.436 [Back to Text]

[45] Friederich Engels to Hermann Schlüter, 30 Mar 1892, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Selected Correspondence. Moscow, Progress Publishers, 1975., p.420 [Back to Text]

[46] The Bhagavad-Gita. Eliot Deutsch, tr. New York, Rinehart and Winston, 1968, 18:49 [Back to Text]

[47] Paine, Rights, op.cit., p.448 [Back to Text]

[48] ibid, pp.505-506 [Back to Text]

[49] ibid, p.508 [Back to Text]

[50] Matthew 22:37-40 [Back to Text]

tokala.net

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o